Scientific paper discussion example

Scientific paper discussion example

3/5/ · How to Write a Strong Discussion in Scientific Manuscripts. A strong Discussion section provides a great deal of analytical depth. Your goal should be to critically analyze and interpret the findings of your study. You should place your findings in the context of published literature and describe how your study moves the field forward 4/7/ · Discussion section of research paper example. Peirce randomly assigned volunteers to a blinded repeated measures design to evaluate their ability to discriminate weights. A standard format is used for these articles in which the author presents the research in an orderly logical manner 22/6/ · The discussion section of a scientific paper is probably the hardest section to write. Authors must highlight their findings but not overstate their relevance. They must introduce other studies for comparison and give their own results context. In many cases, authors also must highlight the limitations of their work and then give readers a

Discussion Section Of Research Paper Example - Floss Papers

The next big step is writing a scientific scientific paper discussion example. It is the last part of your paper, in which you summarize your findings in light of the current literature, scientific paper discussion example. You also need to zero in on how your work will move the field forward and what questions remain. Unlike the abstractthe discussion does not have a broad scientific paper discussion example per se, but is written for both beginners to that particular area of science and experts of the same.

So, what do you need to do to make the scientific discussion section a success? This is the first thing that you need to do when writing a scientific discussion section. Describe very briefly the conclusion from your results, and then explain what it means with respect to what is already known. Remember to emphasize how your results support or refute the current hypotheses in the field, if any. This is also a good place to address if your data conflict with what is established in the field.

Be sure to advocate for your findings and underline how your results significantly move the field forward. In this section, explain any limitations that your hypothesis or experimental approach might have and the reasoning behind them. This will help the field in generating hypotheses and new approaches without facing the same challenges. The discussion becomes scientific paper discussion example rounded when you emphasize not only the impact of the study but also where it may fall short.

Nonetheless, you should think about the questions that your study might lead to while you are writing the discussion. Consider posing a few questions, preferably in the form of a hypothesis, to provide a launchpad for future research.

Now that we have talked about the important features of an authoritative discussion section, here are a few pointers about things to avoid.

You can open the discussion with a sentence that contains a snapshot of the main conclusion, but make sure you stop right there! Rather, swiftly transition into what these results mean and their impact. I mentioned giving your results their proper due and underscoring their significance. But be careful not to extrapolate your results and interpret something that is beyond the scope of the study, scientific paper discussion example.

Keep in mind the difference between what your results suggest at a given point versus what more can be known from them. You can do this by asking more questions and applying other experimental approaches. Present all of your data in the results section. Although readers of your field would probably understand the jargon, scientific paper discussion example, minimize its use to make your paper accessible to a broader audience and to enable a larger impact.

Try and use plain English. In a nutshell, remember that the primary goal of writing a scientific discussion is to accentuate your results. Therefore, take the time to ensure that it is well rounded, succinct, and relevant. Originally published December 7, Reviewed and updated on December 22, Has this helped you? Then please share with your network. I use Mega 7 to align raw sequence primer forward and reverse, where the nucleotide sequence to start cutting weight and stop taking the final part of the sequence.

Facebook Twitter LinkedIn More. Written by Suryatapa Ghosh. Image Credit: Ettore. Masri on May 23, at am. Hi I use Mega 7 to align raw sequence primer forward and reverse, where the nucleotide sequence to start cutting weight and stop taking the final part of the sequence.

thank You. hahaa on October 2, scientific paper discussion example, at pm. Facebook Twitter LinkedIn More Networks.

Share via. Facebook Messenger. Copy Link. Copy link. Copy Copied.

How to write the Discussion part 1

, time: 8:29

How to Write a Strong Discussion in Scientific Manuscripts

22/6/ · The discussion section of a scientific paper is probably the hardest section to write. Authors must highlight their findings but not overstate their relevance. They must introduce other studies for comparison and give their own results context. In many cases, authors also must highlight the limitations of their work and then give readers a 4/7/ · Discussion section of research paper example. Peirce randomly assigned volunteers to a blinded repeated measures design to evaluate their ability to discriminate weights. A standard format is used for these articles in which the author presents the research in an orderly logical manner 3/5/ · How to Write a Strong Discussion in Scientific Manuscripts. A strong Discussion section provides a great deal of analytical depth. Your goal should be to critically analyze and interpret the findings of your study. You should place your findings in the context of published literature and describe how your study moves the field forward